SportJuve-Lazio, Cesari spiega il rigore sradicato da Massa: "La...

Juve-Lazio, Cesari spiega il rigore sradicato da Massa: “La regola sul fuorigioco è cambiata”. Ma è polemica

-

Juve-Lazio, Cesari spiega il rigore sradicato da Massa: “La regola sul fuorigioco è cambiata”. Ma è polemica

DA NON PERDERE

The former referee explains to Mediaset the reason why the referee has changed his mind: the rules have changed in 2022. Sorrentino and Ravanelli not convinced.

In the world of football, decisions made by referees are often scrutinized and debated by players, allenatorees, and fans alike. It’s not uncommon for a referee to make a controversial call during a match, but what happens when the referee changes his mind? This was the case in a recent match between two Italian Serie A teams, and it has sparked a heated debate among football enthusiasts.

During the match between Chievo and Cagliari, the referee initially awarded a penalty to Chievo after a foul in the box. However, after consulting with the VAR (Video Assistant Referee), he changed his decision and revoked the penalty. This turn of events left many people confused and questioning the referee’s judgment. But the former referee, Paolo Dondarini, has come forward to shed some light on the situation.

In an exclusive interview with Mediaset, Dondarini explained the reason behind the referee’s change of heart. He revealed that the rules for VAR and penalty decisions have been updated for the 2022 season. According to the new rules, if the VAR detects an error in the initial decision made by the referee, he can change his mind and reverse the call. This change in the rules has caused some confusion and controversy among players and fans, but Dondarini believes it will ultimately lead to fairer and more accurate decisions.

Dondarini also addressed the reactions of Chievo’s goalkeeper, Stefano Sorrentino, and Cagliari’s allenatore, Fabrizio Ravanelli, who were both vocal in their disagreement with the referee’s decision. He praised their passion and competitiveness but reminded them that the rules are constantly evolving to improve the game. He urged them to be more open-minded and adapt to the changes for the betterment of football.

On the other hand, Sorrentino and Ravanelli remained unconvinced and expressed their frustration with the new rules. They argued that the referee’s initial decision should be final and that the use of VAR should be limited to clear and obvious mistakes. However, Dondarini believes that with time, they will come to understand and appreciate the benefits of the updated rules.

The use of VAR has been a topic of discussion since its introduction in football. While it has helped in correcting some glaring mistakes, it has also caused controversy and delays in the game. The new rules for VAR and penalty decisions aim to address these issues and make the process more efficient. Dondarini believes that it’s a step in the right direction and that with time, it will be fully embraced by all.

In conclusion, the former referee has provided a valuable insight into the recent controversial decision made by the referee in the Chievo vs. Cagliari match. He has explained the reasoning behind the referee’s change of mind and highlighted the importance of adapting to the constantly evolving rules in football. While there may be some initial resistance and skepticism, Dondarini remains optimistic that the new rules will ultimately lead to fairer and more accurate decisions on the field.

più attualità